PDA

View Full Version : ‘Origins’ takes on Life, the Universe and Everything



Dionysus
September 25th, 2004, 05:34 PM
Astrophysicist puts all the pieces
together in PBS miniseries

By Alan Boyle
Science editor
MSNBC
Updated: 5:07 p.m. ET Sept. 24, 2004

You'd think explaining the beginnings of the universe would be enough for astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson. But no: In "Origins," a new book and public-TV miniseries, the director of New York's Hayden Planetarium goes beyond the Big Bang to take on the rise of the solar system, life and intelligence as well.

Any one of those subjects is worthy of being covered in a documentary series at least as ambitious as "Origins," which premieres Tuesday and Wednesday on PBS. And indeed they have been, in productions ranging from "Evolution" to "Life Beyond Earth" to the granddaddy of them all, Carl Sagan's "Cosmos."

So why is Tyson tying all these cosmic subjects together in a four-hour package? He says that's the very point he's trying to bring home.

"Only in the last five years have there been the right kinds of advances in the right kinds of fields to be able to do a miniseries on origins," he told MSNBC.com. "This is 'Origins' with a big O, so it's not just origins of human beings. This is origins of the whole shebang."

Putting together the puzzle
Tyson shows how scientists are blending astrophysics, geology, chemistry, biology and even paleontology to knit together insights about the structure of the universe, the creation of planets and the foundations of life itself.

"While these topics have historically been studied in pieces, they have not until recently been put together in one sweeping story that connects us through time and space to the rest of the universe. And that's the story we tell," he said.

In the series' closing scenes, astronomer Sandra Faber of the University of California at Santa Cruz says the story could serve as a "a new version of Genesis" for the scientific age. Tyson realizes there's something deeply spiritual — and potentially controversial — about such claims. But he contends that modern science and age-old religion can co-exist.

"For those who are religious fundamentalists, who would assert that among other things the universe is 10,000 years old, there's not much place to have a conversation, because those people would claim that the Bible can be used as a science textbook," he said. "But that's not the majority. The majority of religious people take all these discoveries to heart and see them as greater evidence of the glory and majesty of God's creation, and have no problems with it."

The universe in four acts
In the book and in the TV series (check local listings for air times), Tyson doesn't shrink from explaining the nitty-gritty details behind cosmic background radiation, the search for extrasolar planets, extremophile biology and other frontiers in the quest for origins.

The first hour focuses on the latest theories about the formation of the solar system, showing why scientists think a series of early catastrophes — including an interplanetary collision that led to the moon's creation — set the stage for conditions unusually conducive to life's development.

The biologists get their say in the second hour, which focuses on how Earth's chemistry might have given rise to the complex molecules required for living organisms. In the third hour, Tyson explores the rise of intelligence on Earth as well as the search for extraterrestrial intelligence.

The fourth hour goes back to the very beginning, showing how scientists have fleshed out theories about the universe's earliest moments — and have found the chemicals required for life in distant galaxies and neighboring worlds.

Tyson told MSNBC.com that the questions about life beyond Earth represent a gap in the scientific puzzle that is crying out to be filled in.

"The next development we can all look forward to is the discovery of life, or evidence of past life, either on Mars or my favorite target, Europa. That's what I would look forward to in the next decade or two," he said. "But I didn't want to wait that long before we made the series."

The road ahead in space
The miniseries hasn't been the only project on Tyson's plate: In addition to directing the planetarium, he served on the President's Commission on Implementation of U.S. Space Exploration Policy. Tyson sees a clear link between NASA's future and the big picture outlined in "Origins."

"If we are going to think of ourselves as a spacefaring nation and knowingly take the risks involved, then those risks had better be worth it," he said. "And what does 'worth it' mean? It better be, 'Wow, we are discovering a new place, landing on a new planet.' You don't want to bring on those risks simply by driving around the block, or going where hundreds have gone before."

Tyson believes reinvigorating the space effort will produce spin-offs to improve everyday life on earth, and inspire a new generation of scientists and engineers — a work force the country sorely needs.

"Most people don't realize that the American aerospace industry has lost half a million jobs in the last 15 years," he said. "You can't blame that on one president or another. It's just symptomatic of the absence of investment in our own frontier that we pioneered."

Deeper questions
But why space science specifically?

"There is some aspect of studying the universe that does affect everyday life. For example, wouldn't you want to know when the next asteroid is going to hit?" he said.

Even the pure wonder surrounding the latest image from the Hubble Space Telescope, or the latest theory on black holes, serves a deeper purpose, Tyson argued.

"Perhaps there's something deeply encoded within us genetically as human beings, that forces us to ask the question 'What is my place in the universe? How did it all get here?'" he said. "I bet there's not a single person who hasn't looked up into the night sky and thought those very same questions, unprompted, not in fulfillment of a homework assignment — just by looking up.

"And so to not look for the answers to those questions is to deny the most fundamental aspect of human curiosity."

© 2004 MSNBC Interactive

To view links or images in this forum your post count must be 3 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

chadn737
September 26th, 2004, 12:27 AM
This century is starting to suck. We know so much, at times it seems as if there is no trully great mysteries left to discover. The frontiers are quickly dieing. Next to no wilderness left to discover, most of the basic mysteries of our universe being solved. I find it very discouraging when scienitists and other people talk about the end of science. :( Think about it, the most basic and underlying processes and laws of our world have mostly been discovered. We are quickly approaching the point, if we havent already, where science is all about filling in the cracks and application. No more great earth shattering discoveries. I feel like those explorers of old, who witnessed the last great wilderness disappear.

Ahh, Im just being pessimistic, been reading a little bit of "The End of Science" by John Horgan and it has me depressed.

Dionysus
September 26th, 2004, 01:19 AM
Oh come on, Chad. ;)

Surely you can't believe that we are on the verge of running out of things to discover. At best we're only on the cusp of a new and untapped realm of revelations.

While I agree there's not much fun in looking in Bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster anymore due to those stories being so thoroughly debunked, there's a whole universe out there waiting for us to come and shake its hand.

Chin up!

FruitandNut
September 26th, 2004, 01:40 AM
There is still much to discover, Chad. Human curiousity has opened an almost limitless Pandora's Box of knowledge just waiting to be found, if we look in the right corner and are able to understand it. Very probably, our only limit to learning and discovery is our human limits in understanding. Logic deems that since everything else to do with humanity is finite, so is our intellectual capacity.

I believe the Almighty is a bit of a joker in this respect. To endow us with innate curiousity, but to tether it with intellectual limitations.

ps. GLP, it is great fun standing freezing your butt by Loch Ness, peering through snow flurries; and at every ripple on the surface, thinking, 'Is it, isn't it?' You should try it sometime, but bring your thermals.

Dionysus
September 26th, 2004, 02:41 AM
You should try it sometime, but bring your thermals.

I did once, although I didn't have nearly as much time as I would have liked and Nessie never showed me her smiling face. But, if the opportunity should come again, I'll look you up. ;)

FruitandNut
September 26th, 2004, 03:26 AM
Please do GLP. As the UK is just a tad smaller than the States and we are permitted to drive a bit faster, Loch Ness is only a few hours drive away.

There is so much history to see and 'feel' - Cullodon is an 'eerie' place, it is where the last serious try for Scotland to stay separate from England was dashed in 3/4 of a hour of bloodbath. Contrary to the images you get from Hollywood, it was in a way the culmination of a whole series of battles fought across Europe. There were many agendas. There were Scots and English on both sides of the battlefield. Germans, Irish, French, Poles, the odd colonist from across the Pond (not Mel Gibson), and many more were ranged on both sides. The 'English' tactic was not to engage the man directly in front, but to bayonet the exposed side of the 'highlander' raising his sword arm to strike at the soldier next to him. Accurate cannon fire and musketry from the English side caused most of the 'Highlander' casualties.


Beg pardon - back to thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

chadn737
September 26th, 2004, 10:51 AM
Im not usually like that, but sometimes the wierdest stuff gets me down.