If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
Unfortunately this place seems rather dead.
It's been a long time since I last used this website, but I'm thinking about giving it a try again. I believe that when I left I was supposed to be engaging in some sort of formal debate, so I would like to apologise to anyone who was involved in that.
Don't stress it GP
Sorry I haven't PMed you back yet. It's been a busy week for me, too.
hey don't sweat the formal debate thread, come back when you can and reply... as life allows. I look forward to you response regardless of the time it takes. Also.. classy for you to inform Squatch. GL.
To be clear, I amend prop 12 and onward in post 51.
If you like formal logic, you might enjoy this thread of mine from a few years back: http://www.onlinedebate.net/forums/s...istence-of-God
It addresses the logical inconsistency (and actually provides a literal disproof of his model of God) of Plantinga's Modal Ontological Argument. NOTE: I amended the argument in a later post (Post #51) to reduce the number of axioms (I used more than I needed, and there was a much more concise formulation of the argument).
Thank you for the rep. I appreciate your comments, as well. I hope that we can have more of these types of responses, where we add to one another instead of taking away. I know I"m guilty of it myself from time to time, but it's good to be reminded of what this place is really for.
And thank you for the rep. I'm very glad to see you took that post in the spirit in which I wrote it. It speaks well of you that you can endure that sort of reply, and then thank the person who wrote it. Much more character on display than I expected, I'm happy to say, Truly admirable.