Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the Online Debate Network.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Search:

Type: Posts; User: mican333; Keyword(s):

Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.43 seconds.

  1. Re: Democrats - masters of the made up nonsense investigation - RussiaGate

    A claim is a claim. If one is going to say evidence does not exist or that Mueller has no evidence, then they have the burden to support that. And using the fact that no one has shown us the...
  2. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    How do you know that? There are alleged recordings of ghosts - pics, audio, and video. I did a search for "ghost recordings" and found several links to such recordings.

    But of course the...
  3. Re: Protected Classes: Expand, Reduce or Maintain?

    Of course they should receive protection. If gays can't find a job because they are gay, then they will have a harder time surviving within our society than a straight person.
  4. Replies
    10
    Views
    1,901

    Poll: Re: American School Shootings

    Wow, I actually kind of agree with that (first time I agreed with Evensaul)?

    Maybe not every detail but if asked what changed between then and now that has most contributed to school shootings, I...
  5. Re: Democrats - masters of the made up nonsense investigation - RussiaGate

    But then do you agree that evidence could exist that we have not been made aware of? For example, is it possible that Mueller does indeed have evidence that Trump colluded but hasn't made it public...
  6. Re: Democrats - masters of the made up nonsense investigation - RussiaGate

    No, the equivalent would be you saying "there is no evidence" based on evidence not being presented.




    And I didn't say you made that claim.

    You said no one presented evidence and then said...
  7. Re: Democrats - masters of the made up nonsense investigation - RussiaGate

    That's not nitpicking. You said there is no evidence. It's not nitpicking to challenge claims that you make.

    And if you are saying that liberals (media, Democrats, whatever) are saying that...
  8. Re: Democrats - masters of the made up nonsense investigation - RussiaGate

    This seems to be engaging in the argument from ignorance fallacy.

    You can't use your lack of knowledge of evidence as the basis for your claim that there is no evidence.

    Obviously the Mueller...
  9. Replies
    319
    Views
    32,639

    Re: Objective morality vs. subjective morality

    Maybe I misunderstood what you were saying but it appears that you said ""X has no objective moral value" is factually incorrect. Assuming that is what you are saying, I am challenging that position
  10. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    Which is where we left it with ghosts (although God would work as an example as well) and likewise I've challenged your assertion on that basis - not that you've allowed for a sliver of possibility...
  11. Replies
    319
    Views
    32,639

    Re: Objective morality vs. subjective morality

    I don't understand the basis for arguing that the position "X has no objective moral value" is factually incorrect.

    If objective morality does not exist, then it's TRUE that X has no objective...
  12. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    There is no requirement for us to hedge on a position that is evidently true. When I say "The Earth is round" I am NOT allowing for the possibility that it's not round. And about the only way one...
  13. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    I see no real difference. If one makes a baseless claim (such as "all swans are white"), they need to support their position before their claim can be considered valid. So regardless of how you...
  14. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    And in an ODN debate if one does not support his claim when challenged, the claim fails. So my challenge of support will possibly defeat his argument for he will have to retract it if he doesn't...
  15. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    Actually, I would I rebut the claim that "all swans are white" by asking that the claimant support his claims that all swans are white. Since it's possible that he is wrong, he has the burden to...
  16. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    In this thread, Sharma said that he could prove that ghosts don't exist so if THAT's the debate, then forwarding that it's possible that ghosts exist is a direct rebuttal to that position and...
  17. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    Actually, it is significant. If one is faced with the argument that states that it's a fact that X does not exist, then pointing out that X could possibly exist effectively counters that argument. ...
  18. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    Well, you are lumping a bunch of things that have a certain similarity under one big umbrella.

    One of the primary differences between ghosts and Santa Clause is that people have claimed, in all...
  19. Replies
    0
    Views
    359

    Zhavric has been banned

    Just so everyone knows, Zhavric has been banned from ODN so any current debates with him will have to be discontinued. I'm sure this turn of events does not come as a big surprise to our long-term...
  20. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    And your opinion is noted.



    Your opinion is noted.

    And I'm not just being flippant, here. Your assessment of how much information is adequate, by all appearances, is entirely subjective. ...
  21. Replies
    165
    Views
    5,657

    Re: Gun Control and your stance

    Actually, I never made a claim about its plausibility either way. I argued, and supported, that it's possible.

    But anyway, you have been challenged to support that it's not plausible.

    Per the...
  22. Replies
    165
    Views
    5,657

    Re: Gun Control and your stance

    I you to SUPPORT OR RETRACT that my scenario is not plausible.




    I you to SUPPORT OR RETRACT that my scenario is not detailed enough to examine for general understanding.
  23. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    You said you can prove that ghosts don't exist and seeing if you could do that was the whole point of the most recent discussion.

    Me not claiming that ghosts exist does not prove that they don't...
  24. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    Are we also in agreement that you've not been able to prove that ghosts don't exist?
  25. Replies
    165
    Views
    5,657

    Re: Gun Control and your stance

    right. So it's not retracted.

    Which is not to say that you can't move the debate to an issue where whether it's supported or not is not relevant and take it out of play that way.

    Again, if you...
  26. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    Correct. I believe it exists but I don't claim it exists.

    One reason I don't claim it exists is because I have no evidence to back up my belief that it exists. I don't make claims that I cannot...
  27. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    I never claimed that I saw a ghost. I claimed that I believe I saw a ghost as in since what I saw fits the description of a ghost (as I understand ghosts to be defined) I believe I saw a ghost.
    ...
  28. Replies
    165
    Views
    5,657

    Re: Gun Control and your stance

    Well, if you are dropping your argument that 2A is irrelevant, then you certainly have no need to discuss whether a scenario may occur in the future where 2As rights are relevant. And in that case I...
  29. Replies
    165
    Views
    5,657

    Re: Gun Control and your stance

    Again, something is retracted when I retract it, not when you consider it retracted. Again, you considering the Earth to be flat doesn't stop it from being round.

    It is not retracted and you...
  30. Thread: Supernatural?

    by mican333
    Replies
    121
    Views
    2,541

    Re: Supernatural?

    Consider what retracted?




    What is the purpose of those questions?
Results 1 to 30 of 250
Page 1 of 9 1 2 3 4