The Kalam Cosmological Argument goes as follows:
1. Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
2. The Universe began to exist.
3. Therefore, the Universe had a cause.
People claim that this argument is an argument for the existence of God. In other words, it is an argument for the existence of an entity with the following characteristics:
4. You can add in any other characteristics that your God has. It really makes no difference.
The Kalam Cosmological Argument in no way proves the existence of an entity with the above characteristics. The only characteristic that the entity from this argument must have is that it is not caused (not affected by time, like the 4th dimension). But it does not need to be conscious or intelligent or anything else. Being intelligent is not a requirement for not being caused. Not being caused is just a property of this entity.
To use the symbol God to represent the entity that the Kalam Cosmological Argument argues for is a deliberate attempt to mislead people. When people hear God they add on all the characteristics that they believe their God has. But this argument in no way proves that this entity has those characteristics. A more appropriated symbol to use to represent the entity argued for in the Kalam Cosmological Argument is X. If a person were not deliberately trying to mislead people they would use the standard symbol X to represent the entity. By using the symbol God they are deliberately trying to manipulate people.
This is yet another example of how religion is nothing more than a tool used by power hungry people in an attempt to manipulate/control other people.