Removing it for the purpose of killing it ,would I think, especially in cases where no action to preserve it's life once it is born alive is taken.Originally Posted by MICAN
A possible solution I would not be against is technology increases so that we can care for the early gestation child. So.. say someone wants to not be pregnant at 3 weeks, you go the local hospital and have the baby put in intensive care to grow to proper weight. That wouldn't be that much different than the baby abandonment drop offs that we have.. though it would cost more. Probably look Matrix-y, or Borg-ish as a process.
Who knows we could just advance our way to a solution. Yes?
Of course it is not impossible to solve.. we could have another civil war over it.Originally Posted by MICAN
Lets measure dedication real quick.. I'm willing to die to make all abortions illegal.
... Your turn. How dedicated are you? Are you willing to die in order to maintain your position?
Now which side do you think has more?
At worst this issue is like the Holocaust, and war was able to fix that disagreement.
So there is a solution. Personally I think 10million armed citizens at the capital would get er done without need for bloodshed.
I'm not really interested in pleasing everyone, that is just about the only thing that is not possible.Originally Posted by MICAN
I mean, take my example of tec advancement.. there will be some who demand to have their childs brains sucked out of it's head before it leaves her body.
Some people are sick that way.. don't need to even try to please them.
O there are other reasons to have sex, but there is one thing that can not be divorced from sex, and that is that its purpose and function is to have children and pro create.Originally Posted by MICAN
I may not eat a whole cake everyday with the goal of getting fat, but it is kind of a side effect that to ignore would be an act of foolishness. Doing otherwise is simply irresponsible.
That is what your advocating, irresponsible sex. People engaging in an action and ignoring or pretending that a side effect doesn't exist simply because they choose to "not agree" with it.
I'm not stating an opinion, I'm stating an observable fact. Sex = Making babies.Originally Posted by MICAN
Does anyone tell their kids that if they have sex they are not engaging in an act that creates babies? Or do you think that because it can be fun, then if you are just doing it for fun then it's not for making babies?
That even trying to not have a baby, if you become pregnant.. your responsible for that pregnancy?
I'm seriously confused by this cherry picking realities you seem to advocate.
cool beans.Originally Posted by MICAN
Summary, there are several absolutely viable possible options that would "solve" the problem
1) go to war over it. Sure it's bad, but it has happened for other issues and is possible (not probable) but it alone makes your statement false.
2) Pendulum swing/ revival/heart change of the nation. People change their minds all the time. Link the rate of abortions is going down and the legality of it hasn't changed. There could be many factors, but some could argue that it is because many who were pro abortion, don't recommend it to others because of it's negative effects (IE regret). Point being.. not that it is actually occurring, but heart change can occur for the nation.
3) Dictatorship... one day we vote in a guy to "take care of everything" and he solves the issue in the same manner he solves all others.
4) Re-Tech solution