Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the Online Debate Network.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Results 1 to 20 of 43

Threaded View

  1. #1
    ODN's Crotchety Old Man

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location, Location
    Post Thanks / Like

    Is/Ought Problem

    I didn't realize I posted this in a restricted forum, so I'll post it here.

    In many discussions about morality, David Hume's "Is/Ought Problem" is often invoked, especially when any secular moral framework is proposed.

    In short, "is" statements are descriptive (what IS the case), where "ought" statements are normative (what should or ought to be the case). Hume's argument is that you cannot derive what OUGHT to be the case by reference to what IS the case. Or, put another way, you cannot derive moral truths by reference to any facts.

    So, assuming there are objective moral truths, how do we derive moral truths in the absence of objective facts about the universe? Are objective moral truths a kind of fact? If so, what other facts support them? Are they self-evident facts i.e. simply brute facts of the universe?




Similar Threads

  1. Problem
    By Swindall in forum Site Feedback
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: August 8th, 2010, 02:07 PM
  2. Help me with a problem I don't know I have
    By Xanadu Moo in forum Community Advice Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: July 31st, 2007, 10:05 AM
  3. NK problem: op ed
    By cat's meow in forum Current Events
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 11th, 2006, 10:56 PM
  4. The problem with God
    By Lightkeeper in forum Religion
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: March 11th, 2005, 08:44 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts