Welcome guest, is this your first visit? Create Account now to join.
  • Login:

Welcome to the Online Debate Network.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Registered User

    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Ontario, Canada
    Post Thanks / Like

    Is Secular Humanism the Answer?

    I was watching Life, Liberty, and Levin tonight and his guest was David Berlinski, a secular humanist who has battled against atheist ideologies in his book, The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and its Scientific Pretensions. Here are some of the points he raises:

    Has anyone provided a proof of God’s [non]inexistence? Not even close.

    Has quantum cosmology explained the emergence of the universe or why it is here? Not even close.

    Have the sciences explained why our universe seems to be fine-tuned to allow for the existence of life? Not even close.

    Are physicists and biologists willing to believe in anything so long as it is not religious thought? Close enough.

    Has rationalism in moral thought provided us with an understanding of what is good, what is right, and what is moral? Not close enough.

    Has secularism in the terrible twentieth century been a force for good? Not even close to being close.

    Is there a narrow and oppressive orthodoxy of thought and opinion within the sciences? Close enough.

    Does anything in the sciences or in their philosophy justify the claim that religious belief is irrational? Not even ballpark.


    I think I will read the book to see what he has to say. If these points above express his thoughts I think he hit the nail smack bang, dead on the head. In Life, Liberty, and Levin, Berlinski said a scientist has to reject religion for their religious philosophy to make sense (and I would argue that it does not). He also expressed that secular societies are frivolous and that secular ideologies self protect their belief system. He says that seven million scientists use the same system of thought in pushing their philosophies. Levin states that scientists push their theories out as if they are science rather than philosphies (sceintism) concerning life and origins.

    Anyone care to discuss by objections or affirmations to these points?




Similar Threads

  1. Secular Morality vs. Non-Secular Morality
    By futureboy in forum Philosophical Debates
    Replies: 61
    Last Post: March 12th, 2018, 06:15 AM
  2. Christian Humanism / Secular Christianity
    By TheSparrow in forum Religion
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: May 20th, 2011, 08:18 AM
  3. Replies: 116
    Last Post: June 21st, 2005, 08:29 PM
  4. Secular Humanism
    By Zenstone in forum Religion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: August 27th, 2004, 07:38 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts